Original Research

Resting-State fMRI Connectivity in Early-Onset Alzheimer's Disease

Jane Doe1
  1. University Medical Center

Corresponding Author: Jane Doe
Corresponding Author Email: j.doe@univ.edu

Abstract

Background: Early-onset Alzheimer's disease (EOAD) represents a rare variant of AD characterized by aggressive progression and distinct functional network disruptions. This study aimed to characterize resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI) connectivity patterns in EOAD across multiple clinical centers.

Methods: We analyzed rs-fMRI data from 120 EOAD patients and 100 age-matched healthy controls across five neuroimaging centers. Independent component analysis (ICA) and seed-based approaches were utilized to evaluate default mode network (DMN) and frontoparietal network integrity.

Results: EOAD patients exhibited significant hypoconnectivity in the posterior DMN, particularly in the precuneus and posterior cingulate cortex, compared to controls (p < 0.001, FWE-corrected).

Conclusion: These findings highlight profound and widespread functional network degradations in EOAD, establishing precuneus connectivity as a potential robust biomarker for early disease tracking.

Keywords: Alzheimer's disease; fMRI; Default Mode Network; Precuneus; Neuroimaging

1. Introduction

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the most common cause of dementia, characterized by progressive cognitive decline. While late-onset AD constitutes the vast majority of cases, early-onset AD (EOAD)—defined by symptom onset prior to age 65—presents unique clinical and neurobiological challenges. Understanding the neural correlates of EOAD is critical for developing targeted therapeutic interventions.

Recent advances in resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI) have allowed researchers to map intrinsic brain networks in vivo. The Default Mode Network (DMN), a set of brain regions active during rest and deactivated during task performance, is known to be particularly vulnerable to AD pathology.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1 Participants

Data were acquired from 120 patients meeting the NIA-AA criteria for probable AD with early onset, and 100 age-matched cognitively healthy controls. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants or their legal representatives.

[ Figure 1 Graphic Placeholder ]
FIGURE 1. The morphology of functional network connectivity mapped during resting-state fMRI analysis.

2.2 Image Acquisition

Imaging was performed on 3T MRI scanners utilizing a standard 32-channel head coil. The rs-fMRI parameters included a repetition time (TR) of 2000 ms, echo time (TE) of 30 ms, and isotropic voxel size of 3 mm³.

3. Results

Seed-based connectivity analyses revealed that EOAD patients exhibited significantly reduced connectivity between the precuneus and the medial prefrontal cortex compared to healthy controls.

TABLE 1. Demographic and Clinical Characteristics of the Study Cohort

Email Password Mailbody Linktext Link Date
manish011982@outlook.com manish0001 demo1 Google https://www.google.com/ 15th December
manish021957@outlook.com manish0002 demo2 Google https://www.google.com/ 15th December
manish031912@outlook.com manish0003 demo3 Google https://www.google.com/ 15th December
manish041957@outlook.com manish0004 demo4 Google https://www.google.com/ 15th December
manish051919@outlook.com manish0005 demo5 Google https://www.google.com/ 15th December
manish062025@outlook.com manish0006 demo6 Google https://www.google.com/ 15th December
manish071954@outlook.com manish0007 demo7 Google https://www.google.com/ 15th December
manish081979@outlook.com manish0008 demo8 Google https://www.google.com/ 15th December
manish091948@outlook.com manish0009 demo9 Google https://www.google.com/ 15th December
manish102013@outlook.com manish0010 demo10 Google https://www.google.com/ 15th December
DMN: Default Mode Network; fMRI: functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

4. Discussion

Our multicenter findings confirm that early-onset Alzheimer's disease is associated with profound disruptions within the Default Mode Network, particularly centered around the precuneus. These alterations were detectable even after correcting for cortical atrophy, suggesting a primary functional deficit.

Acknowledgements

We would like to express our heartfelt gratitude to the clinical coordinators and the patients who made this multicenter study possible.

Ethical Approval

This study involving human participants was reviewed and approved by the Medical Research Ethics Committee. Approval No. [KYLL-2026-01].

Conflicts of Interest

None declared.


References

  1. Cruz-Jentoft AJ, Bahat G, Bauer J, Boirie Y, Bruyère O, Cederholm T, et al. Sarcopenia: Revised European consensus on definition and diagnosis. Age Ageing. 2019;48(1):16–31. 
  2. Prado CMM, Purcell SA, Alish C, Pereira SL, Deutz NEP, Heyland DK, et al. Implications of low muscle mass across the continuum of care: A narrative review. Ann Med. 2018;50(8):675–693. 
  3. Joglekar S, Asghar A, Mott SL, Johnson BE, Button AM, Clark E, et al. Sarcopenia is an independent predictor of complications following pancreatectomy for adenocarcinoma. J Surg Oncol. 2015;111(6):771–775. 
  4. Lieffers JR, Bathe OF, Fassbender K, Winget M, Baracos VE. Sarcopenia is associated with postoperative infection and delayed recovery from colorectal cancer resection surgery. Br J Cancer. 2012;107(6):931–936. 
  5. Martin L, Birdsell L, Macdonald N, Reiman T, Clandinin MT, McCargar LJ, et al. Cancer cachexia in the age of obesity: Skeletal muscle depletion is a powerful prognostic factor. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31(12):1539–1547. 
  6. Baracos VE, Reiman T, Mourtzakis M, Gioulbasanis I, Antoun S. Body composition in patients with non-small cell lung cancer: A contemporary view of cancer cachexia. Lancet Oncol. 2010;11(8):789–798. 
  7. Mourtzakis M, Prado CMM, Lieffers JR, Reiman T, McCargar LJ, Baracos VE. Practical and precise body composition assessment in cancer patients using computed tomography images. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2008;33(5):997–1006. 
  8. Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML, Vauthey JN, Dindo D, Schulick RD, et al. The Clavien–Dindo classification of surgical complications. Ann Surg. 2009;250(2):187–196. 
  9. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications. Ann Surg. 2004;240(2):205–213. 
  10. Ljungqvist O, Scott M, Fearon KC. Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS): A review. JAMA Surg. 2017;152(3):292–298. 
  11. Pigazzi A, Ellenhorn JDI, Ballantyne GH, Paz IB. Robotic-assisted colorectal surgery: Current perspectives and future directions. Ann Surg Oncol. 2006;13(5):583–590. 
  12. Spinoglio G, Priora F, Bianchi PP, Lucido FS, Petz W, D'Annibale A. Robotic colorectal surgery: First 50 consecutive cases. Surg Endosc. 2008;22(4):1087–1092. 
  13. van der Sluis PC, van der Horst S, May AM, Schippers C, Brosens LAA, Joore HCA, et al. Robot-assisted minimally invasive thoracolaparoscopic esophagectomy versus open transthoracic esophagectomy (ROBOT trial). Lancet. 2019;394(10208):1607–1617. 
  14. Huang DD, Zhou CJ, Wang SL, Mao ST, Zhou XY, Lou N, et al. Impact of preoperative sarcopenia on postoperative complications in gastrointestinal cancer surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Nutr. 2019;38(6):2438–2447. 
  15. Trejo-Avila M, Bozada-Gutiérrez K, Valenzuela-Salazar C, Herrera-Esquivel J, Moreno-Portillo M. Sarcopenia predicts worse postoperative outcomes in gastrointestinal surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Surg. 2021;88:105907. 
  16. Cederholm T, Jensen GL, Correia MITD, Gonzalez MC, Fukushima R, Higashiguchi T, et al. GLIM criteria for the diagnosis of malnutrition. Clin Nutr. 2019;38(1):1–9. 
  17. Fearon K, Strasser F, Anker SD, Bosaeus I, Bruera E, Fainsinger RL, et al. Definition and classification of cancer cachexia: An international consensus. Lancet Oncol. 2011;12(5):489–495. 
  18. Pearse RM, Moreno RP, Bauer P, Pelosi P, Metnitz P, Spies C, et al. Mortality after surgery in Europe: A 7-day cohort study. Lancet. 2012;380(9847):1059–1065. 
  19. Weimann A, Braga M, Carli F, Higashiguchi T, Hübner M, Klek S, et al. ESPEN practical guideline: Clinical nutrition in surgery. Clin Nutr. 2021;40(7):4745–4761. 
  20. Gillis C, Carli F. Promoting perioperative metabolic and nutritional care through prehabilitation. Anesthesiology. 2015;123(6):1455–1472.